This site is devoted to mathematics and its applications. Created and run by Peter Saveliev.

# Integration

### From Mathematics Is A Science

## Contents

- 1 Linear change of variables in integral
- 2 Integration by substitution: compositions
- 3 Change of variables in integrals
- 4 Change of variables in definite integrals
- 5 Trigonometric and other inverse substitutions
- 6 Integration by parts: products
- 7 Approaches to integration
- 8 The areas of infinite regions: improper integrals
- 9 Properties of proper and improper definite integrals

## 1 Linear change of variables in integral

Recall that we can interpret every composition as a change of variables. We are especially interested in a change of *units* because we often measure quantities in multiple ways:

- length and distance: inches, miles, kilometers, light years;
- time: minutes, seconds, hours, years;
- weight: pounds, kilograms, karats;
- temperature: degrees of Celsius, of Fahrenheit,
- etc.

How does such a change affect integral calculus as we know it? As, most often, the conversion formula of a change of units is *linear*, there is a tool available: the linear composition rule for antiderivatives.

Suppose $$y=f(x)$$ is a relation between two quantities $x$ and $y$, then either one may be replaced with a new variable. Let's call them $t$ and $z$ respectively and suppose these replacements are given by some functions:

- case 1: $x=g(t)$;
- case 2: $z=h(y)$.

These substitutions create new relations:

- case 1: $y=k(t)=f(g(t))$;
- case 2: $z=k(x)=h(f(x))$.

*Case 1.* If the change of units is
$$x=g(t)=mt+b,$$
then
$$\int k \, dt=\frac{1}{m}\int f(mt+b) \, dt.$$

**Example.** If $x$ is time and we change the moment from which we start measuring time, we have:
$$g(t)=t+t_0\ \Longrightarrow\ \int k \, dt=\int f(t+t_0) \, dt.$$
$\square$

**Example.** Suppose $x$ is time and $y$ is the location, then function $g$ may represent the change of units of time, such as to seconds, $x$, from minutes, $t$:
$$x=g(t)=60t.$$
We know that the graphs of the quantities describing motion are simply re-scaled versions of the old ones. Let's recast this statement in the integral form.

- Suppose $y=q(t)$ and $y=p(x)$ are the location as functions of minutes and seconds respectively. Then

$$q(t)=p(60t).$$

- Suppose $v(t)=q'(t)$ and $e(x)=p'(x)$ are the velocities as functions of minutes and seconds respectively. Therefore, $\int v \, dt=q$ and $\int e\, dx=p$. We substitute these into the above equation:

$$\int v \, dt=\int e\, dx\Bigg|_{x=60t}.$$ $\square$

**Exercise.** Express the location as a function of minutes in terms of the velocity as a function of seconds.

*Case 2.* If the change of units is
$$z=h(y)=my+b,$$
then
$$\int k \, dx=m\int f \, dx+bx.$$

**Example.** If $y$ is the location and we change the place from which we start measuring, we have:
$$h(x)=y+y_0\ \Longrightarrow\ \int k \, dx=\int f \, dx+y_0x.$$
If we change the direction of the $x$-axis, we have:
$$h(x)=-y\ \Longrightarrow\ \int k \, dx=-\int f \, dx.$$
$\square$

**Example.** Suppose $x$ is time and $y$ is the location, then function $h$ may represent the change of units of length, such as from miles to kilometers:
$$z=h(y)=1.6y.$$
As we know, the quantities describing motion are simply replaced with their *multiples*. The new graphs are the vertically stretched versions of the old ones. Let's recast this statement in the integral form:

- if $a$ is the acceleration with respect to miles, then the velocity with respect to kilometers is $\frac{1}{1.6}\int a \, dx$;
- if $v$ is the velocity with respect to miles, then the location with respect to kilometers is $\frac{1}{1.6}\int v \, dx$.

$\square$

**Exercise.** Prove the above formulas.

**Example.** Recall the example when we have a function $f$ that records the temperature -- in Fahrenheit -- as a function $f$ of time -- in minutes -- replaced with another to records the temperature in Celsius as a function $g$ of time in seconds:

- $s$ time in seconds;
- $m$ time in minutes;
- $F$ temperature in Fahrenheit;
- $C$ temperature in Celsius.

The conversion formulas are: $$m=s/60,$$ and $$C=(F-32)/1.8.$$

These are the relations between the four quantities:
$$g:\quad s \xrightarrow{\quad s/60 \quad} m \xrightarrow{\quad f\quad} F \xrightarrow{\quad (F-32)/1.8\quad} C.$$
And this is the new function:
$$F=k(s)=(f(s/60)-32)/1.8.$$
Then, we have:
$$\begin{array}{lll}
\int k\, ds &=\int \left( (f(s/60)-32)/1.8 \right)\, ds\\
&=\int f(s/60)/1.8 \, ds - \int 32/1.8 \, ds\\
&=\frac{1}{1.8}\int f(s/60) \, ds - 32/1.8s\\
&=\frac{60}{1.8}\int f\, dm \Bigg|_{m=s/60} - 32/1.8s,
\end{array}$$
by the *Linear Composition Rule*. $\square$

**Exercise.** Provide a similar analysis for the sizes of shoes and clothing.

**Example.** The conversion of the number of degrees $y$ to the number of radians $x$ is:
$$x=\frac{\pi}{180}y.$$
Then, for any function $z=f(x)$, we have:
$$\int f\left( \frac{\pi}{180}y \right)\, dy=\frac{180}{\pi}\int f \, dx \Bigg|_{x=\frac{\pi}{180}y}.$$
Because of the extra coefficient, the trigonometric integration formulas, such as $\int \sin x \, dx=-\cos x+C$, don't hold for degrees. Indeed, if we denote *sine and cosine for degrees* by $\sin_dy$ and $\cos_dy$ respectively, we have:
$$\sin_dy=\sin \left( \frac{\pi}{180}y \right) \text{ and } \cos_dy=\cos \left( \frac{\pi}{180}y \right).$$
Therefore,
$$\begin{array}{lll}
\int \sin_dy\, dy&=\frac{180}{\pi}\int \sin x\, dx \Bigg|_{x=\frac{\pi}{180}y}\\
&=\frac{180}{\pi} \cos x \Bigg|_{x=\frac{\pi}{180}y}+C\\
&=\frac{180}{\pi} \cos_d y +C.
\end{array}$$
$\square$

**Example.** What if we are to change our unit to a *logarithmic scale*? For example,
$$x=g(t)=10^t.$$
Then, for a function $y=f(x)$, suppose $F$ is its antiderivative. How do we, as we did above, express antiderivatives of $y=f(10^t)$ in terms of $F$? We would like to have a formula:
$$\int f(10^t)\, dt=...$$
We proceed as before, by the Chain Rule:
$$\frac{d(F\circ g)}{dt}=\frac{dF}{dx}\Bigg|_{x=10^t}\cdot \left( 10^t \right)'=f(10^t)10^t\ln 10.$$
Therefore,
$$F(10^t)=\int f(10^t)\cdot 10^t\ln 10 \, dt,$$
and, further,
$$\int f(10^t)\cdot 10^t \, dt=\frac{1}{\ln 10}F(10^t).$$
Unfortunately, the presence of the factor $10^t$ inside the integral seems to not allow us to finish the job and express *directly* antiderivatives of $y=f(10^t)$ in terms of $F$. We will need further analysis... $\square$

## 2 Integration by substitution: compositions

How do we integrate functions with *compositions*?

Just as with other integration formulas we, again, try to “reverse” the direction of differentiation.

Let's take $\sin (x^{2})$. It is easy to differentiate by the Chain Rule: $$\left( \sin (x^{2}) \right)' = \cos (x^{2}) \cdot 2x .$$ We would like to have a similar formula for the integral of this function: $$\int \sin (x^{2}) \, dx = ? $$ But we don't recognize $\sin (x^{2})$ as the derivative of any function we know...

We *do* recognize $\cos (x^{2}) \cdot 2x$ however, from two lines above! Then,
$$\int\cos (x^{2}) \, 2x \, dx = \sin (x^{2}) + C .$$
More examples? Here they are:
$$\int\sin (x^{2}) \, 2x \, dx = -\cos (x^{2}) + C , \quad \int e^{x^{2}} \, 2x \, dx = e^{x^{2}} + C .$$

Three examples, what do they have in common? We see a pattern: $$\begin{array}{lll} \int & \cos & (x^{2}) & \cdot 2x & dx &= &\sin & (x^{2})\\ \int & \sin & (x^{2}) & \cdot 2x & dx &= &-\cos & (x^{2})\\ \int & e & ^{(x^{2})} & \cdot 2x & dx &= &e & ^{(x^{2})}\\ \int & ? & (x^{2}) & \cdot 2x & dx &= &? & (x^{2}) \end{array}$$ Everything is the same except whatever is behind these question marks.

We know what is missing and we rewrite: $$ \int f(x^{2}) \cdot 2x \, dx = F(x^{2}) + C, $$ where $F$ is an antiderivative of $f$: $$F' =f .$$ So, to integrate these we need to solve this problem: given $f$, find $F$. This is, of course, integration but not with respect to $x$! Let's say $f$ and $F$ are functions of some $u$, an intermediate variable, given by: $$u=g(x).$$ Then to find $F$, we integrate $f$ with respect to $u$: $$F(u) = \int f(u)\, du .$$

**Example.** Evaluate:
$$\int \underbrace{\sqrt[3]{x^{2}}}_{\text{decompose}}\cdot 2x \, dx = ?$$
The key step is to break the composition apart, to find $u,f,F$. So, $u=x^2,\ f(u)=u^{1/3}$. Then,
$$F(u) = \int \sqrt[3]{u}\, du = \int u^{\frac{1}{3}} \, du\ \overset{\text{PF}}{=\! =\! =\! =} \frac{u^{\frac{1}{3}+1}}{\frac{1}{3} + 1} + C = \frac{3}{4}u^{\frac{4}{3}} + C.$$
Even though integration is finished, this isn't the answer because it has to be a function of $x$! We need to substitute $u=x^2$ back into this function:
$$F(x^2) = \frac{3}{4}\left(x^2\right)^{\frac{4}{3}} + C.$$
$\square$

For a more general analysis, we replace $x^{2}$ with $g(x)$. We want to integrate $$\int f(g(x))\cdot g'(x)\, dx.$$ Then the answer is $F(g(x))$, where $F$ is an antiderivative of $f$: $$F' = f.$$

**Theorem (Integration by substitution).** Given a continuous function $f$ and a differentiable function $g$, we have:
$$\int f(g(x))\cdot g'(x)\, dx=F(g(x))+C,$$
where $F$ is any antiderivative of $f$.

**Proof.**
$$\begin{array}{lrl}
\left( F(g(x)) \right)' &\overset{\text{CR}}{=\! =\! =\! =} &F'(g(x)\cdot g'(x) \\
&= &f(g(x))g'(x).
\end{array}$$
$\blacksquare$

Conclusion: we can integrate compositions when

- the derivative of the “inside” function is present as a factor.

In other words, as a *prerequisite* we need to have:
$$\int f(\underbrace{g(x)}_{\text{inside function}}) \cdot \underbrace{g'(x)}_{\text{its derivative}} \, dx.$$

**Example.** Evaluate
$$\int \sqrt{x^{3} + 1} \cdot 3x^{2} \, dx .$$
Observe first that the derivative of the function inside is present:
$$(x^{3} + 1)'=3x^2.$$
So, this should work...
$$\begin{array}{lll}
\text{decomposition:} & \text{integration:}\\
f(u) = \sqrt{u} & \Longrightarrow F(u) = \int u^{\frac{1}{2}} \, du = \frac{2}{3} u^{\frac{3}{2}} + C \\
u = g(x) = x^{3} + 1 &\Longrightarrow g'(x) = 3x^{2} \\
\text{back-substitution: } & F(g(x))= \frac{2}{3}(x^{3} + 1)^{\frac{3}{2}} + C
\end{array}$$
$\square$

**Example.** Evaluate
$$\int \sqrt{x^{3} + 1} \, x^{2} \, dx = ? $$
Just notice that $(x^{3} + 1 )' = 3x^{2}$, not $x^{2}$. The condition doesn't seem to be satisfied...

We'll try to apply the formula anyway: $$\left. \begin{aligned} \text{first substitution: } u &= x^{3} + 1 \\ \text{second substitution: } u' &= 3x^{2} .\\ \end{aligned} \right\} \begin{array}{lll} \text{ we convert the integral with respect to } x \\ \text{ to a new one with respect to } u\end{array} $$

We already have all we need above. We break what's inside the integral apart but not in the obvious way: $$\sqrt{x^{3} + 1} = \sqrt u, \quad x^{2} = \frac{1}{3} u'.$$ Now we deal with the integral itself. $$\begin{array}{lrl} \int\underbrace{ \sqrt{x^{3} + 1}}_{u \text{ inside}} \, x^{2} \, dx &=&\int \sqrt{u} \cdot \frac{1}{3} du & \\ & = &\frac{1}{3}\int u^{\frac{1}{2}}\, du \, & \gets\text{ new integral!} \\ & \overset{\text{PF}}{=\! =\! =}&\frac{1}{3} \, \frac{2}{3} u^{\frac{3}{2}} + C \, &\gets \text{ integration finished!} \\ &=& \frac{1}{3} \, \frac{2}{3} (x^{3} + 1)^{\frac{3}{2}} + C \, &\gets \text{back-substitution } u = x^{3} + 1. \end{array} $$ Answer: $$\int \sqrt{x^{3} + 1} \, x^{2} \, dx =\frac{2}{9} (x^{3} + 1)^{\frac{3}{2}} + C.$$ $\square$

**Exercise.** Evaluate
$$\int \sqrt{4^{3} + 1} \, x^{2} \, dx. $$

**Exercise.** Evaluate
$$\int \sqrt{x^{4} + 1} \, x^{3} \, dx. $$

We can re-write the formula as follows: $$\int f(g(x))\cdot g'(x)\, dx=\int f(u)\, du\Bigg|_{u=g(x)}.$$ This way we can see that there is no assumption that the integration in the right-hand side has been carried out.

The simplest kind of integral for which this approach *always* works are linear changes of variables. This is the familiar formula:
$$\int f(mx+b)\, dx= \frac{1}{m}\int f(u)\, du\Bigg|_{u=mx+b}.$$

**Example.** Evaluate:
$$\int e^{3x}\, dx=\frac{1}{3}\int e^u\, du\Bigg|_{u=3x}=\frac{1}{3}e^u+C\Bigg|_{u=3x}=\frac{1}{3}e^{3x}+C.$$
$\square$

**Example.** Evaluate:
$$\int e^{x} \sin (e^{x}) \, dx.$$
Let's break the composition, $\sin(e^{x})$, that we see:
$$ u = e^{x}, \quad y = \sin u. $$
Furthermore,
$$u' = e^{x} . $$
Use these two:
$$\begin{array}{lll}
\int e^{x} \sin (e^{x}) \, dx &=& \int \sin u \, du &\text{ ...evaluate } \\
&=& -\cos u + C &\text{ ...substitute}\\
&=& \cos e^{x} + C.
\end{array}$$
$\square$

**Exercise.** Evaluate:
$$\int \sqrt{\sin x}\cdot \cos x\, dx.$$

**Exercise.** Evaluate:
$$\int e^{e^x+x}\, dx.$$

**Example.**
$$\begin{array}{lllll}
\int \tan x \, dx &= & \text{ What, no composition?! } \\
&= \int \frac{\sin x}{\cos x} \, dx & \text{ ...there is division though...}\\
&= \int \sin x\cdot\frac{1}{\cos x} \, dx & \text{ ...there is multiplication in fact...}\\
&= \int \sin x\left(\cos x\right)^{-1} \, dx & \text{ ...there is composition after all...}\\
&= -\int \left( \cos x \right)' \left( \cos x \right)^{-1} \, dx & \text{ ...and the derivative of the inside function too...}\\
&= -\int \left( u \right)^{-1} \, du & \text{ ...the formula applies with } u=\cos x...\\
&= -\ln u+C & \text{ ...integrate... } \\
&= -\ln \cos x+C & \text{ ...back-substitute. }
\end{array}$$
$\square$

## 3 Change of variables in integrals

**Example.** Let's take another look at:
$$\int xe^{x^2}\, dx=\frac{1}{2}\int e^u \, du=e^u+C=e^{x^2}+C.$$
It works so well! Changing the power, $x$ to $x^2$, ruins this nice arrangement:
$$\int x^2e^{x^2}\, dx=\int ue^u\,dx =...\text{ now what?}$$
In fact, no power of $x$ other than $1$:
$$\int x^3e^{x^2}\, dx=?\quad \int x^4e^{x^2}\, dx=?\quad \int x^{1/2}e^{x^2}\, dx=?\quad \int x^\pi e^{x^2}\, dx=?$$
will allow integration by substitution according to the formula. $\square$

Warning: do not replace $dx$ with $du$!

We still would like to be able to *convert* an integral to a new variable...

Recall the formula of integration by substitution: $$\int f(g(x))\cdot g'(x)\, dx=\int f(u)\, du\Bigg|_{u=g(x)}.$$ Subject to the substitution, the formula takes this form: $$\int f(u)\cdot \frac{du}{dx}\, dx=\int f(u)\, du.$$ Note how $dx$ “cancels” turning the integral with respect to $x$ to one with respect to $u$. We take this idea one step further...

**Corollary (Change of variables).** Under a substitution $u=u(x)$ in an integral, we also substitute:
$$u'\, dx= du.$$

**Example.** Let's apply the formula to the example from the last section:
$$\int e^{x} \sin (e^{x}) \, dx.$$
We start with a substitution this time:
$$ u = e^{x}\ \Longrightarrow\ du = e^{x}dx \ \Longrightarrow\ dx=\frac{du}{e^x}. $$
*Substitute* these into the integral:
$$\begin{array}{lll}
\int e^{x} \sin (e^{x}) \, dx &=&\int e^{x} \sin u \, \frac{du}{e^x} & \\
&=&\int \sin u \, du & \\
&=& -\cos u + C &\\
&=& \cos e^{x} + C.
\end{array}$$
$\square$

With the formula, we can change variables in any integral, even the kind that's not subject to integration by substitution.

**Example.** Let's evaluate:
$$\int x^2e^{x^2}\, dx=?$$
The change of variables is the same:
$$u=x^2 \ \Longrightarrow\ du=2x\, dx \ \Longrightarrow\ dx=\frac{du}{2x}.$$
Substitute:
$$\int x^2e^{x^2}\, dx=\int x^2 e^u\, \frac{du}{2x}=\frac{1}{2}\int \frac{1}{x} e^u\, du= \frac{1}{2}\int u^{-1/2} e^u\, du.$$
Even though the change of variables hasn't made the integral easier to integrate, the conversion is complete! $\square$

We can have *any* substitution in *any* integral.

**Example.** Another change of variables in the same integral:
$$u=x^3 \ \Longrightarrow\ du=3x^2\, dx \ \Longrightarrow\ dx=\frac{du}{3x^2}.$$
Substitute:
$$\int x^2e^{x^2}\, dx=\int x^2 e^u\, \frac{du}{3x^2}=\frac{1}{3}\int \frac{1}{x^2} e^u\, du= \frac{1}{3}\int u^{-2/3} e^u\, du.$$
Note that we just needed an *extra substitution*. $\square$

**Exercise.** Carry out substitution $u=x^4$ in the above integral.

**Exercise.** Carry out substitution $u=x$ in the above integral.

**Example.** If we hope to simplify the integral, the substitution should be the “inside” function of the composition. For example, consider:
$$\int \sqrt{x+1}\cdot x\, dx.$$
We choose $u=x+1$. Then, $du=dx$. Therefore,
$$\begin{array}{lll}
\int \sqrt{x+1}\cdot x\, dx &= \int u^{1/2}(u-1)\, du\\
&=\int u^{1/2}u\, du+\int u^{1/2}(-1)\, du\\
&=\int u^{3/2}u\, du-\int u^{1/2}\, du\\
&=\frac{2}{5}u^{5/2}-\frac{2}{3}u^{3/2}+C\\
&=\frac{2}{5}(x+1)^{5/2}-\frac{2}{3}(x+1)^{3/2}+C.
\end{array}$$
$\square$

**Example.** Let's revisit the issue of converting units to a *logarithmic scale*:
$$x=10^t.$$
Then,
$$dx=10^t \ln 10 \, dt \ \Longrightarrow\ dt=\frac{dx}{10^t \ln 10}.$$
Substitute into the integral and simplify:
$$\int f(10^t)\, dt=\int f(x)\, \frac{dx}{10^t \ln 10} =\frac{1}{\ln 10}\int f(x) \frac{1}{x}\, dx.$$
We have expressed the integral of $y=f(10^t)$ as an integral with respect to $x$. $\square$

This is the *summary* of what is going on. We start with a familiar diagram for the Chain Rule of differentiation:
$$
\newcommand{\ra}[1]{\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\xrightarrow{\quad#1\quad}\!\!\!\!\!}
\newcommand{\da}[1]{\left\downarrow{\scriptstyle#1}\vphantom{\displaystyle\int_0^1}\right.}
\newcommand{\la}[1]{\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\xleftarrow{\quad#1\quad}\!\!\!\!\!}
\newcommand{\ua}[1]{\left\uparrow{\scriptstyle#1}\vphantom{\displaystyle\int_0^1}\right.}
\begin{array}{ccccccccc}
& f(g(x))g'(x) &\la{\frac{d}{dx}} & F(g(x)) \\
&\quad \ua{\text{CR}} & &\ \ \da{u=g(x)}&\small\text{substitution } \\
& f(u) &\la{\frac{d}{du}} & F(u)
\end{array}$$
And then we make the diagram about integration by reversing the horizontal arrows:
$$
\newcommand{\ra}[1]{\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\xrightarrow{\quad#1\quad}\!\!\!\!\!}
\newcommand{\da}[1]{\left\downarrow{\scriptstyle#1}\vphantom{\displaystyle\int_0^1}\right.}
\newcommand{\la}[1]{\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\xleftarrow{\quad#1\quad}\!\!\!\!\!}
\newcommand{\ua}[1]{\left\uparrow{\scriptstyle#1}\vphantom{\displaystyle\int_0^1}\right.}
\begin{array}{ccccccccc}
& f(g(x))g'(x) &\ra{\int\ dx} & F(g(x)) \\
&\quad \ua{\text{CR}} & &\ \ \da{u=g(x)}&\small\text{substitution } \\
& f(u) &\ra{\int\ du} & F(u)
\end{array}$$
Thus the change of variables method of integration gives us an alternative way of getting from top left to top right (integration with respect to $x$). We take a detour by following the counterclockwise path around the square: the Chain Rule formula in reverse, integration with respect to $u$, back-substitution.

**Exercise.** Execute the substitution $u=e^x$ for the integral (don't evaluate the resulting integral):
$$\int \sin (1+e^x)\, dx.$$

## 4 Change of variables in definite integrals

What happens when we use substitution to evaluate *definite* integrals?

First, nothing *has to* change. After all, according to the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, all we need is an antiderivative. So, to find
$$\int_a^b f(g(x))g'(x)\, dx,$$
we just need to evaluate
$$F(x)=\int f(g(x))g'(x)\, dx,$$
as before. Then last step is easy:
$$\int_a^b f(g(x))g'(x)\, dx=F(b)-F(a).$$

**Example.** Let's evaluate:
$$\int_0^1 e^{x} \sin (e^{x}) \, dx.$$
We have already carried out this computation:
$$\int e^{x} \sin (e^{x}) \, dx = \cos e^{x} + C.$$
Therefore,
$$\int_0^1 e^{x} \sin (e^{x}) \, dx = \cos e^{1}- \cos e^{0}=\cos e- \cos 1.$$
Done! $\square$

A better question is, what happens to the definite integral under a *change of variables*, in addition to the formula in the last section?

And the answer is, the change of the variable also changes the *domain of integration*!

**Example.** Let's take a closer look at the computation in the last example:
$$\begin{array}{lll}
\int e^{x} \sin (e^{x}) \, dx &= \cos u+C&=\cos e^{x} + C;\\
\int_0^1 e^{x} \sin (e^{x}) \, dx &= \cos e^{1}- \cos e^{0}&=\cos e- \cos 1.
\end{array}$$
It is done via the substitution $u=e^x$. We realize that we could have jumped from $\cos u+C$ to $\cos e- \cos 1$! Indeed:
$$\cos u\Bigg|_1^e=\cos e- \cos 1.$$
We just need to see the relation between the *bounds* of the two integrals, with respect to $x$ and $u$:
$$\begin{array}{lll}
x=0\ \mapsto\ &u=e^0=1,\\
x=1\ \mapsto\ &u=e^1=e.
\end{array}$$
The back-substitution was a redundant step. $\square$

So, under the change of variable $u=g(x)$, the domain of integration changes from

- $[a,b]$ for $x$ to
- $[f(a),f(b)]$ for $u$.

**Example.** Find the area under the graph of $h(x)=x^2\cos x^3$ from $0$ to $2$. Then,
$$\text{Area }=\int_0^{2} x^2\cos x^3\, dx.$$
Substitution:
$$u=x^3\ \Longrightarrow\ du=3x^2\, dx\ \Longrightarrow\ dx=\frac{du}{3x^2}.$$
Then,
$$\int x^2\cos x^3\, dx=\int x^2\cos u\, \frac{du}{3x^2}=\frac{1}{3}\int \cos u\, du.$$
Now, what would this computation look like for the definite integral? Let's make it clear what variables we are referring to:
$$\int_{x=0}^{x=2} x^2\cos x^3\, dx=\int_{x=0}^{x=2} x^2\cos u\, \frac{du}{3x^2}=\frac{1}{3}\int_{x=0}^{x=2} \cos u\, du.$$
We have mismatched variables! In order to fix that, we find the domain of integration by finding the bounds for $u$ from the corresponding bounds for $x$:
$$\begin{array}{lll}
x=0\ \mapsto\ &u=0^3=0,\\
x=2\ \mapsto\ &u=2^3=8.
\end{array}$$
So, $[0,2]$ for $x$ becomes $[0,8]$ for $u$. Then,
$$\int_{x=0}^{x=2} x^2\cos x^3\, dx=\frac{1}{3}\int_{x=0}^{x=2} \cos u\, du=\frac{1}{3}\int_{u=0}^{u=8} \cos u\, du.$$
The change of variables in the definite integral has been carried out! We don't have to go back to $x$ in order to finish the computation:
$$\text{Area }=\frac{1}{3}\int_{u=0}^{u=8} \cos u\, du\ \overset{\text{FTC}}{=\! =\! =\! =}\ \sin u\Bigg|_{u=0}^{u=8}=\sin 8-\sin 0=\sin 8.$$
In other words, we have discovered that these areas are equal:

$\square$

**Corollary (Integration by substitution).** Under a substitution $u=g(x)$ in a definite integral, we have:
$$\int_a^b f(g(x))\cdot g'(x)\, dx=F(g(b))-F(g(a)),$$
for any antiderivative $F$ of $f$.

**Proof.** Recall the formula of integration by substitution:
$$\int f(g(x))\cdot g'(x)\, dx=\int f(u)\, du\Bigg|_{u=g(x)}=F(g(x)).$$
The formula follows now from the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. $\blacksquare$

Another way to put it: $$\int_{x=a}^{x=b} f(g(x))\cdot g'(x)\, dx=\int_{u=g(a)}^{u=g(b)} f(u)\, du.$$

**Corollary (Change of variables).** Under a substitution $u=u(x)$ in a definite integral, we have:
$$\int_{a}^{b} f(u)\cdot \frac{du}{dx}\, dx=\int_{u(a)}^{u(b)} f(u)\, du.$$

This is what happens to integration by substitution when we proceed to definite integration. The extra step is the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, for either variable: $$\newcommand{\ra}[1]{\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\xrightarrow{\quad#1\quad}\!\!\!\!\!} \newcommand{\da}[1]{\left\downarrow{\scriptstyle#1}\vphantom{\displaystyle\int_0^1}\right.} \newcommand{\la}[1]{\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\xleftarrow{\quad#1\quad}\!\!\!\!\!} \newcommand{\ua}[1]{\left\uparrow{\scriptstyle#1}\vphantom{\displaystyle\int_0^1}\right.} \begin{array}{ccccccccc} & f(g(x))g'(x) &\ra{\int\, .. \, dx} & F(g(x)) &\ra{\text{ FTC }} & I&\\ \small\text{substitution }&\quad \ua{CR} & &\ \ \da{u=g(x)} && || &\small\text{ same!} \\ & f(u) &\ra{\int\, .. \, du} & F(u) &\ra{\text{ FTC }} & I& \end{array}$$ Thus, the result of definite integration -- a number -- is the same no matter what variable we choose.

## 5 Trigonometric and other inverse substitutions

What is the area of a circle of radius $R$? $$\text{area }=2\int_{-R}^R \sqrt{R^2-x^2}\, dx=\pi R^2.$$

To prove the formula, we need integrate this: $$\int \sqrt{R^2-x^2}\, dx.$$ How?

There is a composition... Let's try substitution! The obvious choice is: $$u=R^2-x^2\ \Longrightarrow\ du=-2x\, dx.$$ Substitute: $$\int \sqrt{R^2-x^2}\, dx=\int\sqrt{u}\,\frac{du}{-2x}=\int\sqrt{u}\,\frac{du}{-2\sqrt{R^2-u}}=-\frac{1}{2}\int\sqrt{\frac{u}{R^2-u}}\,du.$$ Change of variables is completed but, unfortunately, the new integral is no simpler than the original!

Let's take another look at the integrand:
$$y=\sqrt{R^2-x^2}.$$
What is this? A circle of radius $R$. More precisely, its upper half is given directly (explicitly) as the graph of this *function*. The circle is also given by a *relation* (implicitly) by:
$$x^2+y^2=R^2.$$
There may be a third possibility, if we just find a better variable...

On left, we interpret the graph representation of the circle visualized as *motion*: time on the $x$-axis and location on the $y$-axis. As a result, the dots appear at equal intervals of time, i.e., horizontally:

What we can see is how motion starts fast, then slows down to almost zero in the middle, and then accelerates again. But what if we consider instead a simple rotation on the plane? Such a rotation would progress through the angles at a constant rate, shown on right. So, maybe the *angle*, $t$, should be our variable? Then, the formulas for $x$ and $y$ come from the basic trigonometry:
$$\begin{array}{ll}
x=R\cos t,\\
y=R\sin t.
\end{array}$$

A new variable appears naturally...

Indeed,
$$x=R\cos t$$
is our substitution. Then main difference from previous examples of integration by substitution is that here, conversely, the new variable is given in terms of the old. In other words, this is an *inverse* substitution. No matter! We have:
$$t=\cos^{-1}(x/R),$$
with
$$-\pi/2\le t\le \pi/2.$$
In fact, to carry out this change of variables all we need is this:
$$dx=-R\sin t \, dt.$$
To simplify, we'll also need the *Pythagorean Theorem*:
$$\sin^2t+\cos^2t=1.$$
Then,
$$\begin{array}{lll}
\int \sqrt{R^2-x^2}\, dx&=\int \sqrt{R^2-\cos^2t}\cdot (-R\sin t \, dt)&\text{...use PT}\\
&=\int R\sin t\cdot (-R\sin t \, dt)&\text{...change of variables finished}\\
&=-R^2\int \sin^2 t\, dt&\text{...a trig formula next}\\
&=-R^2\int \frac{1-\cos 2t}{2}\, dt&\\
&=-\frac{R^2}{2}\left( \int dt-\int\cos 2t\, dt\right)&\\
&=-\frac{R^2}{2}\left( t-\frac{1}{2}\sin 2t+C\right)&\\
&=\frac{R^2}{2}\left( t-\frac{1}{2}\sin 2t \right)-C.&\\
\end{array}$$
Integration is finished. We won't do back-substitution because our interest is a definite integral. We only need to know the bounds for the new variable:
$$x=-R\Longrightarrow t=-\pi/2,\quad x=R\Longrightarrow t=\pi/2.$$
Substitute:
$$\begin{array}{lll}
\text{area of a circle of radius } R\ &=2\cdot\int_{x=-R}^{x=R} \sqrt{R^2-x^2}\, dx\\
&=2\cdot \frac{R^2}{2}\left( t-\frac{1}{2}\sin 2t \right)\Bigg|_{t=-\pi/2}^{t=\pi/2}\\
&=R^2\left( \pi/2-\frac{1}{2}\sin (2\pi/2) - (-\pi/2)+\frac{1}{2}\sin 2(-\pi/2) \right)\\
&=\pi R^2.
\end{array}$$

**Exercise.** Modify the proof for the substitution $x=R\sin t$.

**Trigonometric Substitution:**

- when the integrand contains $\sqrt{a^2-x^2}$ (or sometimes $a^2-x^2$) for some $a>0$, use substitution $x=a\cos t$ (or $x=a\sin t$);
- when the integrand contains $\sqrt{a^2+x^2}$ (or sometimes $a^2+x^2$) for some $a>0$, use substitution $x=a\tan t$;
- when the integrand contains $\sqrt{x^2-a^2}$ (or sometimes $x^2-a^2$) for some $a>0$, use substitution $x=a\sec t$ or $x=a\sin t$.

Warning: this is not a theorem.

**Exercise.** Evaluate this integral:
$$\int \frac{1}{1+x^2}\, dx.$$

**Exercise.** Evaluate this integral:
$$\int \sqrt{x^2-1}\, dx.$$

## 6 Integration by parts: products

The *Product Rule for derivatives* expresses the derivative of the product of two functions in terms of their derivatives (and the functions themselves):
$$\left( f\cdot g\right)'=f'\cdot g+f\cdot g'.$$
There is no “Product Rule for integrals” that would express the integral of the product of two functions in terms of their integrals (and the functions themselves):
$$\int\left( f\cdot g\right)\, dx=?$$

Let's nonetheless try to get whatever we can from PR. We integrate it: $$\begin{array}{lll} \int\left( f\cdot g\right)'\, dx &=\int\left( f'\cdot g+f\cdot g'\right)\, dx&\text{ we use FTC...}\\ f\cdot g &=\int\left( f'\cdot g+f\cdot g'\right)\, dx\\ &=\int f'\cdot g \,dx +\int f\cdot g'\,dx.\\ \end{array}$$ Now, these two integrals are very similar and either of them may be seen as the integral of a certain product. We derive something useful from this.

**Theorem (Integration by Parts).** For two integrable functions $f$ and $g$, we have
$$\int f\cdot g' \,dx= f\cdot g -\int f'\cdot g\,dx.$$

We can also use the *substitution formula*,
$$dh=h'(x)\, dx,$$
To obtain a more compact version.

**Corollary (Integration by Parts).** For two integrable functions $f$ and $g$, we have
$$\int f\, dg= fg -\int g\, df.$$

The formula is traditionally restated with these, changed, names of the functions: $$\int udv= uv -\int vdu.$$

When we are to decide which technique of integration to use, we recognize that for integration by part we have to see in the integrand:

- a multiplication, but
- no composition.

Then, the approach won't work for
$$\int xe^{x^2}\, dx$$
(we use substitution for that), nor for
$$\int e^{x^2}\, dx$$
(we look it up). The approach *might* work for
$$\int xe^x\, dx.$$

**Example.** If we are to integrate this, we need to match it with the integral in the formula. These two must be equal:
$$\begin{array}{ll}
\int u\, dv\\
\int x\cdot e^x\, dx.
\end{array}$$
Unfortunately, there are at least two ways to match them:

- (a) $u=e^x,\quad dv=x\, dx$, and
- (b) $u=x,\quad dv=e^x\, dx$.

We'll have to do both.

(a) To use the formula, we need the derivative of $u$ and the integral of $v$:
$$\begin{array}{ll}
u=e^x & \Longrightarrow & du=e^x\, dx;\\
dv=x\, dx & \Longrightarrow & v=\int x\, dx=\frac{x^2}{2}.
\end{array}$$
Integrating to find $v$ is the first *part* of integration. The second *part* is the one in the formula:
$$\int udv= uv -\int vdu=e^x\cdot \frac{x^2}{2}- \int \frac{x^2}{2}\cdot e^x\, dx.$$
Unfortunately, we discover that the new integral looks even complex than the original! Indeed, the power of $x$ went up... Before attempting other techniques let's try to reverse the choice of $u$ and $v$.

(b) Once again, we need the derivative of $u$ and the integral of $v$: $$\begin{array}{ll} u=x & \Longrightarrow & du=dx;\\ dv=e^x\, dx & \Longrightarrow & v=\int e^x\, dx=e^x. \end{array}$$ We substitute these into the formula: $$\int udv= uv -\int vdu=x\cdot e^x- \int e^x\, dx.$$ We pause here to stop and appreciate the fact that the new integral is so less complex than the original! That's because the power of $x$ went down... We finish the computation: $$\int xe^x\, dx=x\cdot e^x- \int e^x\, dx=xe^x- e^x+C.$$ $\square$

The lesson seems to be:

- choose for $u$ the part of the integrand that will be simplified by differentiation, and
- choose for $dv$ the part of the integrand that will be simplified by integration,

or at least will remain as simple.

**Example.** Integrate:
$$\int x^2e^x\, dx.$$
Once again, there are (at least) two ways to choose $u$ and $dv$:

- (a) $u=e^x,\quad dv=x^2\, dx$, and
- (b) $u=x^2,\quad dv=e^x\, dx$.

We'll try both.

(a) We find the derivative of $u$ and the integral of $v$: $$\begin{array}{ll} u=e^x & \Longrightarrow & du=e^x\, dx;\\ dv=x^2\, dx & \Longrightarrow & v=\int x^2\, dx=\frac{x^3}{3}. \end{array}$$ Even though $du$ is just as simple as $u$, integration of $dv$ has made things worse. Indeed, we have: $$\int udv= uv -\int vdu=e^x\cdot \frac{x^3}{3}- \int \frac{x^3}{3}\cdot e^x\, dx.$$ It's not simpler as the power of $x$ goes up! We reverse the choice of $u$ and $v$.

(b) The derivative of $u$ and the integral of $v$: $$\begin{array}{ll} u=x^2 & \Longrightarrow & du=2x\,dx;\\ dv=e^x\, dx & \Longrightarrow & v=\int e^x\, dx=e^x. \end{array}$$ Here $dv$ is simpler than $u$; that's a good sign. We substitute these into the formula: $$\int udv= uv -\int vdu=x^2\cdot e^x- \int e^x\cdot 2x\, dx.$$ Again, we pause to appreciate the fact that the integration task has been simplified! That's because the power of $x$ went down... We finish the computation using the integration by part formula and the result of the last example: $$\int x^2e^x\, dx=x^2\cdot e^x- \int e^x2x\, dx=x^2e^x- 2xe^x+ 2e^x+C.$$ $\square$

The lesson is that integration by parts might bring simplification of the integral and might require another application of integration by parts.

**Exercise.** Apply the formula found in this example to the previous example, part (a).

**Exercise.** In the last example, try this decomposition of the integrand: $u=x, \ dv=xe^x$.

**Example.** Integrate:
$$\int x^3\sin x\, dx.$$
There are two ways to split the integrand, $u$ and $dv$, but we already know that integration by part will reduce the power $x$ -- if we choose $u=x^3$. we are left with $dv=\sin x$. Then
$$\begin{array}{ll}
u=x^3 & \Longrightarrow & du=3x^2\,dx;\\
dv=\sin x\, dx & \Longrightarrow & v=\int \sin x\, dx=-\cos x.
\end{array}$$
By parts:
$$\int x^3\sin x\, dx= uv -\int vdu=-x^3\cos x- \int 3x^2\cdot \sin x\, dx.$$
The last integral is almost identical to the original but the power of $x$ is down by $1$. $\square$

**Exercise.** Finish the computation by integrating by parts two more times.

**Example.** Integrate:
$$\int \cos ^{-1}x\, dx.$$
There seems to be nothing to split in the integrand!.. There is:
$$\begin{array}{lll}
u=\cos ^{-1}x & \Longrightarrow & du=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-x^2}}\,dx;\\
dv=dx & \Longrightarrow & v=\int \, dx=x.
\end{array}$$
By parts:
$$\begin{array}{lll}
\int \cos ^{-1}x\, dx&= uv -\int vdu\\
&=\cos ^{-1}x\cdot x- \int x\left( -\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-x^2}} \right)\, dx&\text{...done with parts}\\
&=x\cos ^{-1}x+ \int \frac{x}{\sqrt{1-x^2}}\, dx&\text{...by substitution: }&\quad z=1-x^2\\
&=x\cos ^{-1}x+ \int \frac{1}{\sqrt{z}}\, \frac{dz}{-2}&& \Rightarrow dz=-2xdx\\
&=x\cos ^{-1}x-\frac{1}{2} z^{-1/2}\, dz\\
&=x\cos ^{-1}x-\frac{1}{2} \frac{z^{1/2}}{1/2}+C&\text{...back-substitution}\\
&=x\cos ^{-1}x-\sqrt{1-x^2}+C.\\
\end{array}$$
$\square$

**Exercise.** Apply the Integration by Parts formula to the integral,
$$\int xe^x\, dx,$$
with these two choices of the “parts”:

- (a) $x$ and $e^x\, dx$,
- (b) $e^x$ and $x\, dx$.

## 7 Approaches to integration

Let's summarize what we know about integration and compare it to what we know about differentiation.

First, the similarities.

Just as there is a list of elementary derivatives, a list of elementary integrals. In fact, the latter comes from the former.

**Integral formulas for specific functions:**
$$\begin{array}{lll}
\int e^{x} \, dx &= e^{x} + C; \\
\int \sin x \, dx &= -\cos x + C; \\
\int \cos x \, dx &= \sin x + C; \\
\int x^{s} \, dx &= \frac{x^{s+1}}{s+1} + C, \, \text{ provided } s \neq 1;\\
\int \frac{1}{x} \, dx &= \ln |x| + C, \quad\text{ on intervals} .
\end{array}$$

So, given a function, we find it on the list and here is its integral, just like with the derivatives. And, in either case, the list is very short!

There are differences already between the two. The presence of “$+C$” in each integral indicates that the answer contains infinitely many functions. Also, the formulas for integrals only remain valid when limited to *intervals*.

Just as there are algebraic rules of differentiation, there are algebraic rules of integration. The latter comes, in part, from the former.

**Rules of integrals:**

*Sum Rule:*

$$\int (f+g)\, dx=\int f\, dx+\int g\, dx;$$

*Constant Multiple Rule:*

$$\int (cf)\, dx=c\int f\, dx.$$

The way we apply the two rules is very similar to the one for derivatives:

- when the function to be integrated is the sum of two (just as when it was to be differentiated), we split the integral into two and then deal with either (simpler) integral separately;
- when the function to be integrated is a constant multiple of another (just as when it was to be differentiated), we factor it out and then deal with the remaining (simpler) integral.

The similarities stop here!

What about the Product Rule for integration? There is none in the above sense:

- when the function to be integrated is the product of two (unlike when it was to be differentiated), we
*can't*split the integral into two and then deal with either integral separately.

The reason is that the Product Rule for differentiation can't be easily reversed... unless one of the functions is, in fact, the derivative of a function that we know or can find. That's the *Integration by Parts* formula:
$$\int fg'\,dx=fg-\int gf'\,dx.$$

And what about the Quotient Rule for integration? There is none, unless you are willing to interpret division as multiplication by the reciprocal...

Now, what about the Chain Rule? Same problem as with the products:

- when the function to be integrated is the composition of two (unlike when it was to be differentiated), we
*can't*split the integral into two and then deal with either integral separately.

The reason is that the Chain Rule for differentiation can't be easily reversed... unless the derivative of the function on the inside is, in fact, present as a factor. That's the *Integration by Substitution* formula:
$$\int f\circ gg'\,dx=\int f\,du.$$
The Chain Rule for differentiation is also easily reversed when the function on the inside is linear. That's the *Linear Composition Rule:*
$$\int f(mx+b)\, dx=\tfrac{1}{m}\int f(t)\, dt\Big|_{t=mx+b},$$
provided $m\ne 0$.

**Example.** Compute:
$$\int_{0}^{1} \left( x^{3} + 3e^{x} - \sin x \right) \, dx.$$
Ignore the bounds at first:
$$\begin{array}{rcl}
\int \left( x^{3} + 3e^{x} - \sin x \right) \, dx & \overset{\text{SR}}{=\! =\! =\! =\! =} &\int x^{3} \, dx + \int 3e^{x} \, dx + \int \sin x \, dx \\
& \overset{\text{CMR}}{=\! =\! =\! =\! =} &\int x^{3} \, dx + 3 \int e^{x} \, dx + \int \sin x \, dx \\
& \overset{\text{formulas}}{=\! =\! =\! =\! =}& \frac{x^{4}}{4} + 3\cdot e^{x} - \left( -\cos x \right) + C \\
& \overset{\text{simplify}}{=\! =\! =\! =\! =}& \frac{1}{4}x^{4} + 3e^{x} + \cos x + C.
\end{array}$$
That's the hard part, finding antiderivatives. Now the easy part:
$$\begin{array}{rcl}
\int_{0}^{1} \left( x^{3} + 3e^{x} - \sin x \right) \, dx & \overset{\text{FTC}}{=\! =\! =\! =\! =} &\left. \frac{1}{4} \, x^{4} + 3e^{x} + \cos x \right|_{0}^{1} \\
& \overset{\text{substitute}}{=\! =\! =\! =\! =}& \left( \frac{1}{4} \, 1^{4} + 3e^{1} + \cos 1 \right) + \left( \frac{1}{4} \, 0^{4} + 3e^{0} + \cos 0 \right) \\
&= &\frac{1}{4} + 3e + \cos 1 - 0 - 3 -1.
\end{array}$$
The hard part is easy when there is no multiplication, division, or composition of functions. $\square$

Warning: The most important approach to integration is using the table of integrals!

The main difference is that *differentiation never fails* but integration may fail in the sense that the integral might turn out to be a function we have never seen before or even a function that no-one has seen before!

To see what happens recall how we created a *new function*, the Gauss error function, as the integral:
$$\operatorname{erf}(x)=\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}}\int e^{-x^2}\, dx.$$
There are many more examples of those and even if we keep adding these new functions to the list of “familiar” functions, there will always remain integrals not on the list...

We can use the same approach to re-discover “familiar” function -- starting at the other end. For example, integrating this rational function produces the logarithm and, consequently, its inverse, the exponential function: $$\int _1^x \frac{1}{t}\, dt=\ln x\ \leadsto\ e^y.$$ Integrating this algebraic function produces the arcsine and, consequently, its inverse, the sine: $$\int_0^x\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}\, dt=\sin^{-1}x\ \leadsto\ \sin y.$$

## 8 The areas of infinite regions: improper integrals

We can only integrate over *closed and bounded* intervals such as $[a,b]$.

**Example.** Consider the familiar formula:
$$\int \frac{1}{x} \, dx = \ln |x| + C,x \ne 0.$$
We need to be careful how to interpret it. The formula holds only on *the two intervals*, separately, of the domain of $\frac{1}{x}$, i.e., $(-\infty,0)$ and $(0,\infty)$, not $(-\infty,0)\cup(0,\infty)$. This means that $C$ can vary from the one to the other! For example, this is an antiderivative:
$$F(x) = \begin{cases}
\ln |x| + 3 & \text{ for } x < 0, \\
\ln |x| + 5 & \text{ for } x > 0.
\end{cases}$$
It is even more dangerous to ignore the gap in the domain when we deal with definite integrals. For example, one might have this:
$$\int_{-1}^1 \frac{1}{x} \, dx \ \overset{\text{???}}{=\! =\! =\! =}\ \ln |x| \Bigg|_{-1}^1 = \ln 1-\ln |-1|=0.$$
Wrong! The integral is, in fact, undefined! Indeed, $f$ is not integrable on $[-1,1]$ simply because it's undefined at $x=0$. Furthermore, even though the positive and the negative areas seem to cancel each other, both are in fact *infinite*...

...and shouldn't think that $$\infty-\infty\ \overset{\text{???}}{=\! =\! =\! =}\ 0.$$ $\square$

**Exercise.** Show that the function in the example won't become integrable whatever number we assign to $x=0$.

We will next try to understand the meaning of the area of an infinite or, better, *unbounded* region.

**Example.** The area of this “infinite rectangle”, like the one below, must be infinite:

Why or in what sense? This region contains a growing sequence of (finite) rectangles the areas of which grow to infinity. $\square$

Then, our approach will be to “exhaust” the unbounded region with a sequence of bounded regions and then examine the *limit of their areas*.

We will restrict our attention to regions

- unbounded with respect to the $x$-axis, and
- unbounded with respect to the $y$-axis.

As we only deal with regions determined by graphs of functions, the former case is about functions with *unbounded domains* or, better, unbounded domains of integration and the latter about functions with *unbounded ranges* (i.e., unbounded functions).

Even though these two classes of functions are very different, the issue is the same. For example, $y=1/x$ defines two identical unbounded regions:

We start with the former case: *unbounded domain of integration*.

We will concentrate on *rays*:
$$(-\infty, b] \text{ and } [a,\infty).$$
The rays will have to be “exhausted” with *closed and bounded* intervals because those are the only ones that we can handle.

**Example.** Consider a constant function,
$$f(x)=k \text{ on } [a,\infty).$$
Then the area of the region above the interval $[a,b]$ with $b>a$, and the integral from $a$ to $b$, is equal to $(b-a)k$, which goes to $\infty$ as $b$ goes to infinity.

Therefore, the area of the infinite strip is infinite, as expected. $\square$

**Example.** Consider again
$$f(x)=1/x \text{ on } [1,\infty).$$
Then the area under this graph over this ray in the $x$-axis is shown above. This unbounded region is exhausted by bounded ones. How? The obvious approach is to use the Riemann sums. The challenge is that one has to both make the rectangles thinner and thinner (as before) and make the right end of the interval extend more and more to the right.

Note that when $h=1$, this sum is called a *series* to be discussed in Chapter 14. An alternative approach is to rely on what we already know about areas under the graphs when the interval is bounded. The underlying ray of this region is exhausted with bounded intervals. They all have the same left bound, $1$, but the right bound, $b$, is approaching infinity:
$$[1,b]\ \leadsto \ [1,\infty)\text{ as } b\to \infty .$$
Then,
$$\int_1^b \frac{1}{x}\, dx=\ln b-\ln 1 \to\infty \text{ as } b\to \infty ,$$
which is then the area of the unbounded region. $\square$

**Example.** So, the band under the graph of $f(x)=1/x $ is narrowing down but not fast enough to avoid growing its area to infinity. Let's try, in contrast, a function that would give us a narrower strip. How about $g(x)=1/x^2$? We have:
$$\int_1^b \frac{1}{x^2}\, dx=-\frac{1}{b}+1 \to 1 \text{ as } b\to \infty ,$$
which is then the area of the unbounded region. It's finite! $\square$

**Example.** What function decreases faster than all $1/x^n,\ n=1,2,3,...$? It's the *exponential decay function*:
$$f(x)=e^{-x} \text{ on } [1,\infty).$$
Again, the unbounded region under this graph above this ray is exhausted by exhausting the underlying ray with the bounded intervals:
$$[1,b]\ \leadsto \ [1,\infty)\text{ as } b\to \infty .$$

Then, $$\text{total area }=\lim_{b\to \infty} \int_1^b e^{-x}\, dx=\lim_{b\to \infty}(-e^{-b}-(-e^{-1}))=\frac{1}{e} .$$ $\square$

The area of an unbounded region may be finite!

**Exercise.** Find the area under the graphs of (a) $y=\frac{1}{x^2}$, and (b) $y=\frac{1}{\sqrt{x}}$, over $[1,\infty)$.

**Example.** What if the function isn't all positive? What is the area -- over the positive numbers -- under a sinusoid?

The analysis is identical: $$\text{total area }=\lim_{b\to \infty} \int_0^b \cos x\, dx=\lim_{b\to \infty}(\sin b - \sin 0)\quad \text{...DNE }.$$ The limit doesn't exit and, therefore, there is no area. $\square$

Just as with all limits, there are three possible outcomes: this may be a number, or it may be infinite, or it may be undefined.

This is the summary. We “exhaust” the unbounded domain of integration, $(-\infty,b]$ or $[a,\infty)$, with bounded ones. If the function is integrable on these closed and bounded domains, we then “exhaust” a possibly infinite area of over this domain with finite ones. If the limits of these integrals exists, it is **denoted** by:
$$\int_{-\infty}^b f(t) \, dt=\lim_{a \to -\infty} \int_a^b f(t) \, dt,$$
and
$$\int_a^\infty f(t) \, dt=\lim_{b \to +\infty} \int_a^b f(t) \, dt .$$
These limits can also be infinite.

Warning: Even though the notation suggests that the domain of integration is the whole ray, this is nothing but an abbreviation for the limit on the right.

We also define the integral over the whole real line $(-\infty,\infty)$ in terms of the ones over rays, as the sum of two corresponding integrals (limits) with the following **notation**:
$$\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(t) \, dt=\int_{-\infty}^0 f(t) \, dt+\int_0^\infty f(t) \, dt.$$

In the case of infinite limits, we follow the *algebra of infinities*:
$$\begin{array}{llll}
(\text{ number }) + (+\infty)&=+\infty,\\
(\text{ number }) + (-\infty)&=-\infty\\
(+\infty) + (+\infty)&=+\infty,\\
(-\infty) + (-\infty)&=-\infty.
\end{array}$$

**Definition.** The limits of the integrals above are called *improper integrals*. When this limit exists, or the two limits in the last case exist, we say that the improper integral *converges* and the function is *integrable*, otherwise it *diverges*.

**Exercise.** Show that replacing $0$ in the definition of the integral over $(-\infty,\infty)$ with any real $c$ will produce the same result.

**Exercise.** Show that replacing the last definition with
$$\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(t) \, dt\ \overset{\text{???}}{=\! =\! =\! =}\ \lim_{R\to \infty}\int_{-R}^R f(t) \, dt.$$
won't always produce the same result.

The definition of the integral over $(-\infty,\infty)$ follows the additivity of the integral that comes from the idea of additivity of the areas. For example, this is what such an integral looks like:

The function is $e^{-x^2}$ and the integral is known to be convergent.

**Theorem (Integrals of Reciprocals).** For any $a>0$, we have
$$\int_a^\infty \frac{1}{x^p}\, dx=
\begin{cases}
\frac{a^{1-p}}{p-1} &\text{ when } p>1,\\
\infty &\text{ when } 0<p\le 1.
\end{cases}$$

**Proof.** For $p\ne 1$, we have:
$$\begin{array}{lll}
\int_a^\infty \frac{1}{x^p}\, dx&=\lim_{b\to\infty}\int_a^b \frac{1}{x^p}\, dx&\text{ ...by definition}\\
&=\lim_{b\to\infty}\int_a^b x^{-p}\, dx&\text{ ...use PF next}\\
&=\lim_{b\to\infty} \frac{1}{-p+1}x^{-p+1}\Bigg|_a^b\\
&=\frac{1}{-p+1}\lim_{b\to\infty} \left( b^{-p+1}-a^{-p+1} \right)\\
&=\frac{1}{-p+1}\left( \lim_{b\to\infty} b^{-p+1}-a^{-p+1} \right).
\end{array}$$
The remaining limit is $0$ when $-p+1<0$ and it is infinite when $-p+1>0$. $\blacksquare$

**Exercise.** Finish the proof.

In other words, the integral

- converges when $p>1$,
- diverges when $0<p\le 1$.

Now, the latter case: *unbounded functions and bounded domains of integration*.

**Example.** Consider
$$f(x)=\frac{1}{1-x} \text{ on } [0,1).$$
The area under this graph over this half-open interval in the $x$-axis is shown below:

How do we understand the area under this graph over this interval? We can use the Riemann sums, exactly as always, as long as it $1$ is not among its sample points!

Alternatively, this unbounded region is exhausted by bounded ones. How? The underlying interval of this region is by exhausted with closed intervals. They all have the same left bound, $a$, but the right bound, $b$, is approaching $1$: $$[0,b]\ \leadsto \ [1,\infty)\text{ as } b\to 1.$$ Then, $$\int_0^b \frac{1}{1-x}\, dx= -\ln (1-b)-\ln 1 \to\infty \text{ as } b\to 1 ,$$ which is then the area of the unbounded region. $\square$

The definition of the Riemann integral simply doesn't apply to unbounded functions. Instead, we consider a *restriction* of the function to a smaller, closed, interval.

We will concentrate on *half-open intervals*:
$$(c, b] \text{ and } [a,c).$$

As you see, the analysis is very similar to the former case, with this substitution:
$$[a,\infty)\ \longrightarrow\ [a,c).$$
Just as the former, the latter will have to be “exhausted” with *closed and bounded* intervals.

**Example.** Let's consider
$$f(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-x}} \text{ on } [0,1).$$
Even though their graphs look almost identical, this one increases slower than the last one. Again, the unbounded region under this graph over this half-open interval is exhausted by exhausting the underlying ray with the closed intervals, $[0,b]$ as $b\to 1$. Then
$$\text{unbounded area }=\lim_{b\to 1} \int_0^b \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-x}}\, dx=\lim_{b\to 1}-2\sqrt{1-x}\Bigg|_{0}^b=2 .$$
$\square$

The area of an unbounded region may be finite!

**Example.** What if the function isn't all positive? What is the area under an oscillating graph, such as
$$y=\sin\frac{1}{x}?$$

With the graph like this, one can *guess* that the limit doesn't exist and, therefore, there is no area. $\square$

Just as with all limits, there are three possible outcomes for these areas: a number, infinity, or undefined.

This is the summary. We “exhaust” the half-open domain of integration, $(a,b]$ or $[a,b)$, with closed ones. If the function is integrable on these closed and bounded domains, we then “exhaust” a possibly infinite area over this domain with finite ones. If the limits of these integrals exists, it is **denoted** by:
$$\int_{c}^b f(t) \, dt=\lim_{a \to c} \int_a^b f(t) \, dt,$$
and
$$\int_a^c f(t) \, dt=\lim_{b \to c} \int_a^b f(t) \, dt .$$
These limits can also be infinite.

Warning: The notation is unfortunately identical to the one for proper integrals, but this is nothing but an abbreviation for the limit on the right.

We also define the integral over an open interval in terms of the ones over half-open intervals, with the following **notation**:
$$\int_{a}^b f(t) \, dt=\int_{a}^c f(t) \, dt + \int_c^b f(t) \, dt,$$
for any $c$ between $a$ and $b$. In the case of infinite limits, we follow the algebra of infinities above.

We repeat the definition for the former case.

**Definition.** The limits of the integrals above are (also) called *improper integrals*. When the limit exists, or the two limits in the last case exist, we say that the improper integral *converges* and the function is *integrable*, otherwise it *diverges*.

**Exercise.** Show that replacing the last definition with
$$\int_{a}^b f(t) \, dt\ \overset{\text{???}}{=\! =\! =\! =}\ \lim_{\varepsilon\to 0^+}\int_{a+\varepsilon}^{b-\varepsilon} f(t) \, dt.$$
won't produce the same result.

The definition of the integral over an interval with a possible vertical asymptote inside follows additivity of the integral that comes from the idea of additivity of the areas. For example, this is what such an integral looks like:

The function is $\frac{1}{\sqrt{|x|}}$ and the integral is known to be convergent.

**Theorem (Integrals of Reciprocals).** For any $a>0$, we have
$$\int_0^b \frac{1}{x^p}\, dx=
\begin{cases}
\frac{b^{1-p}}{1-p} &\text{ when } 0<p<1,\\
\infty &\text{ when } p\ge 1.
\end{cases}$$

**Proof.** For $p\ne 1$, we have:
$$\begin{array}{lll}
\int_0^b \frac{1}{x^p}\, dx&=\lim_{a\to 0^+}\int_a^b \frac{1}{x^p}\, dx&\text{ ...by definition}\\
&=\lim_{a\to 0^+}\int_a^b x^{-p}\, dx&\text{ ...use PF next}\\
&=\lim_{a\to 0^+} \frac{1}{-p+1}x^{-p+1}\Bigg|_a^b\\
&=\frac{1}{-p+1}\lim_{a\to 0^+} \left( b^{-p+1}-a^{-p+1} \right)\\
&=\frac{1}{-p+1}\left( b^{-p+1}-\lim_{a\to 0^+}a^{-p+1} \right).
\end{array}$$
The remaining limit is $0$ when $-p+1>0$ and it is infinite when $-p+1<0$. $\blacksquare$

**Exercise.** Finish the proof.

**Exercise.** Match the integrals and the areas of the two theorems about integrals of the reciprocals. Hint: it's about symmetry.

In other words, the integral $\int_0^b \frac{1}{x^p}\, dx$:

- converges when $p>1$,
- diverges when $0<p\le 1$.

This is the summary of the two types of improper integrals for these functions:

**Exercise.** What possible values can the area between the graph of a function and its asymptote take? Give an example for each value.

## 9 Properties of proper and improper definite integrals

Thus, we have extended the idea of Riemann integral with the domain of integration:

- closed bounded intervals, such as $[a,b]$, to
- half-open, such as $(a,b]$ and $[a,b)$, and also possibly infinite, such as $(-\infty,b]$ and $[a,\infty)$, and further to
- open intervals, such as $(a,b)$, and possibly infinite, such as $(-\infty,+\infty)$.

If we denote an interval by $I$, all these integrals can be written in the same **notation**:
$$\int_I f\, dx.$$

Let's take a more general view. We consider integrals over an arbitrary interval $I$.

These integrals have identical properties. In fact, the properties of improper integrals follow from the corresponding properties of proper integrals (which in turn come from the properties of limits).

As regions are joined together via union, their areas are added -- even though the regions may be unbounded. The area interpretation of additivity is the same as before, as long as the integrals are convergent:

**Theorem (Additivity).** Suppose $f$ is integrable over intervals $I$ and $J$ that share at most one point. If $I\cup J$ is an interval then $f$ is integrable over $I\cup J$ and we have:
$$\int_I f\, dx +\int_J f\, dx = \int_{I\cup J} f\, dx.$$

**Theorem.** If $f$ is integrable over interval $I$ then it is also integrable over any interval $J\subset I$.

The algebraic rules are the same.

**Theorem (Sum Rule).** Suppose $f$ and $g$ are integrable functions over interval $I$. Then so is $f+g$ and we have:
$$\int_I \left( f + g \right)\, dx = \int_I f\, dx + \int_I g\, dx. $$

**Theorem (Constant Multiple Rule).** Suppose $f$ is an integrable function over interval $I$. Then so is $c\cdot f$ for any real $c$ and we have:
$$ \int_I (c\cdot f)\, dx = c \cdot \int_I f\, dx.$$

**Exercise.** Prove the two theorems. Hint: use the rules of limits.

**Exercise.** What is the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus for improper integrals?

The following is a major theorem from Chapter 4.

**Theorem.** Every monotone bounded sequence converges.

Since the convergence of the antiderivative of a function is what determines the convergence of its definite integral, we look at its behavior, we realize that it is monotone when the function is either all positive or all negative. This way, we exclude functions with a different kind of divergence of its integral, such as $\sin$ and $\cos$:

Then, we have the following.

**Theorem (Convergence).** If a function is non-negative, its integrals are either convergent or infinite.

**Exercise.** Prove the theorem.

Then, to establish convergence we can use a direct comparison with another function, a function that has a convergent integral. Similarly, to establish divergence we can use a direct comparison with another function, a function that has a divergent integral.

**Example.** For example,

- the integral $\int_1^\infty\frac{1}{x^{1/2}}\, dx$ diverges because $\int_1^\infty\frac{1}{x^{1/3}}\, dx$ does, and
- the integral $\int_1^\infty\frac{1}{x^{3}}\, dx$ converges because $\int_1^\infty\frac{1}{x^2}\, dx$ does.

We draw these conclusions from these inequalities: $$\begin{array}{ccccccc} 1/3&\le 1/2&\le &2&\le 3 &\Longrightarrow\\ x^{1/3}&\le x^{1/2}&\le &x^2&\le x^3&\Longrightarrow\\ \frac{1}{x^{1/3}}&\ge\frac{1}{x^{1/2}}&\ge&\frac{1}{x^2}&\ge\frac{1}{x^3}&\Longrightarrow\\ \int_1^\infty\frac{1}{x^{1/3}}\, dx&\ge\int_1^\infty\frac{1}{x^{1/2}}\, dx&=\infty>&\int_1^\infty\frac{1}{x^2}\, dx&\ge\int_1^\infty\frac{1}{x^3}\, dx. \end{array}$$ $\square$

**Exercise.** What does the middle inequality give us?

The idea applies to all improper integrals.

**Theorem (Comparison).** Suppose $I$ is an interval, and
$$0\le f(x)\le g(x)$$
for all $x$ in $I$. Then, for improper integrals over $I$, we have:

- (a) if the improper integral of $f$ diverges then so does the improper integral of $g$;
- (b) if the improper integral of $g$ converges then so does the improper integral of $f$ and

$$0\le \int_Id \, dx \le \int_I g \, dx.$$

**Exercise.** Prove the theorem.

Suppose the functions are non-negative. According to the *Convergence Theorem*, the following **notation** makes sense:

- when the integral diverges, we write:

$$\int_I f\, dx=\infty;$$

- when the integral converges, we write:

$$\int_If\, dx<\infty.$$

Then the *Comparison Theorem* above can be read from these simple inequalities:
$$\int_I f\, dx\ge \int_I g\, dx=\infty;$$
and
$$\int_I f\, dx\le \int_I g\, dx<\infty.$$

**Exercise.** What if we use *strict* inequalities in the above example?

**Exercise.** What can we derive about the convergence/divergence of the improper integrals of the reciprocal powers based entirely on that of $1/x$. Hint:

**Exercise.** State and prove the Squeeze Theorem for improper integrals.