<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TechCrunch finally realizes that image recognition has not been solved</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inperc.com/blog2/index.php/2008/03/30/techcrunch-finally-realizes-that-image-recognition-has-not-been-solved/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/03/30/techcrunch-finally-realizes-that-image-recognition-has-not-been-solved/</link>
	<description>Computer vision and image analysis for newcomers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:13:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Irina</title>
		<link>http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/03/30/techcrunch-finally-realizes-that-image-recognition-has-not-been-solved/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Irina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/03/30/techcrunch-finally-realizes-that-image-recognition-has-not-been-solved/#comment-195</guid>
		<description>You can see it now at www.picollator.com. Choose any photo from most popular list and click Find similar. 
Do you know any engine which is able to find photos by pencil drawing? As for me I know just the sole engine:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can see it now at <a href="http://www.picollator.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.picollator.com</a>. Choose any photo from most popular list and click Find similar.<br />
Do you know any engine which is able to find photos by pencil drawing? As for me I know just the sole engine:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/03/30/techcrunch-finally-realizes-that-image-recognition-has-not-been-solved/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/03/30/techcrunch-finally-realizes-that-image-recognition-has-not-been-solved/#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Well, the only good way to verify your claim would be by adding two different images of the same person to the index and trying to find one with the other as a query. That&#039;s not allowed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the only good way to verify your claim would be by adding two different images of the same person to the index and trying to find one with the other as a query. That&#8217;s not allowed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irina</title>
		<link>http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/03/30/techcrunch-finally-realizes-that-image-recognition-has-not-been-solved/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Irina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/03/30/techcrunch-finally-realizes-that-image-recognition-has-not-been-solved/#comment-193</guid>
		<description>Surely. It can recognize faces. It is able to find your photos if these photos are in picollator index.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely. It can recognize faces. It is able to find your photos if these photos are in picollator index.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/03/30/techcrunch-finally-realizes-that-image-recognition-has-not-been-solved/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/03/30/techcrunch-finally-realizes-that-image-recognition-has-not-been-solved/#comment-192</guid>
		<description>It sounds like Picollator is better than Google. That wouldn&#039;t surprise me. But can it recognize faces?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like Picollator is better than Google. That wouldn&#8217;t surprise me. But can it recognize faces?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irina</title>
		<link>http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/03/30/techcrunch-finally-realizes-that-image-recognition-has-not-been-solved/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Irina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/03/30/techcrunch-finally-realizes-that-image-recognition-has-not-been-solved/#comment-191</guid>
		<description>Actually, Google is able to detect faces and it finds just portraits. Picollator engine searches for images by content and it enables to process and find group photos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Google is able to detect faces and it finds just portraits. Picollator engine searches for images by content and it enables to process and find group photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/03/30/techcrunch-finally-realizes-that-image-recognition-has-not-been-solved/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/03/30/techcrunch-finally-realizes-that-image-recognition-has-not-been-solved/#comment-136</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t need face recognition for that - all it takes is face _detection_. And yes, it&#039;s pretty good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t need face recognition for that &#8211; all it takes is face _detection_. And yes, it&#8217;s pretty good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Régis B.</title>
		<link>http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/03/30/techcrunch-finally-realizes-that-image-recognition-has-not-been-solved/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Régis B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/03/30/techcrunch-finally-realizes-that-image-recognition-has-not-been-solved/#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Actually, an image search engine for faces exists already: in Google image, if you had an &quot;imgtype=face&quot; argument in the url the output is quite good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, an image search engine for faces exists already: in Google image, if you had an &#8220;imgtype=face&#8221; argument in the url the output is quite good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/03/30/techcrunch-finally-realizes-that-image-recognition-has-not-been-solved/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/03/30/techcrunch-finally-realizes-that-image-recognition-has-not-been-solved/#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Ajay, your 10 year prediction could be true but it’s also very pessimistic! In business terms 10 years means never. Consider this consequence: in the near future no company should even try to build a product if it would have to rely on image recognition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ajay, your 10 year prediction could be true but it’s also very pessimistic! In business terms 10 years means never. Consider this consequence: in the near future no company should even try to build a product if it would have to rely on image recognition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajay</title>
		<link>http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/03/30/techcrunch-finally-realizes-that-image-recognition-has-not-been-solved/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inperc.com/blog2/2008/03/30/techcrunch-finally-realizes-that-image-recognition-has-not-been-solved/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>When the fundamentals of vision are not even understood yet, and these folks are out there to make money out of it, failure is an obvious outcome. This however does not say anything about if there exists a solution to the computer vision problems, and if you ask me, I believe you can get there over a decade. 

So, the enthusiasts should chill a bit, and restrict themselves to vision competitions like SRVC if they have something exciting to show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the fundamentals of vision are not even understood yet, and these folks are out there to make money out of it, failure is an obvious outcome. This however does not say anything about if there exists a solution to the computer vision problems, and if you ask me, I believe you can get there over a decade. </p>
<p>So, the enthusiasts should chill a bit, and restrict themselves to vision competitions like SRVC if they have something exciting to show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
